These awards should have made them directly instead Red.es that RTVE.es
I think the latter is put in full on dangerous ground. I mean, a chain RTVE.es very active on the network and has recently added between their products some of the major creations of the network and the single question arises: how can maintain objectivity and independence ?
me explain with an example rather obvious (which is also portrayed in the video above):
If they give awards for projects such as "lamb TV" will be encouraging creators home, and if not they will be discriminated against one of the most interactive and experimental network.
On the other hand I have understood that projects such as "Hustler " not participate because they will not grant them allowances for only 8000 €.
This means that the product shall not UGC most successful and relevant created in Spain during the last year. Of course, if they do not give a prize to them ... What sense does it create some awards to celebrate the best of creation on the Web?
To see how this solves the issue.
Does it make sense to mount an awards TVE like this and then not to give prizes to Calico Electronic , Enjuto Mojamuto, Pocoyo , Lamb TV ... because they are home-related projects?
Can afford to reward some of these projects without losing credibility? In November
clear all doubts.
The truth is that awards like this are necessary and most welcome. Surely
INVI have to change some things in their bases to be a reference to brands like Red.es (specifically Ficod ) and TVE need to maintain credibility with a younger crowd.
Follow me on twitter.com / movilfilmfest
0 comments:
Post a Comment